Screener
SGRW vs VOT
Harbor Active Small Cap Growth ETF vs Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Fund
Key differences
- SGRW follows a active selection strategy; VOT uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| SGRW | VOT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.05% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $32.2B |
| Since | — | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.65% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +11.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.73 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.79% |
| Max drawdown | -16.25% | -37.19% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SGRW and VOT
Explore further