Screener
SHAG vs WTLS
WisdomTree Yield Enhanced U.S. Short-Term Aggregate Bond Fund vs Wisdomtree Efficient Long/Short US Equity Fund
Key differences
- SHAG costs 0.76% less per year.
- SHAG is significantly larger than WTLS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SHAG is classified as fixed income, while WTLS is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- SHAG follows a index tracking strategy; WTLS uses long short.
- SHAG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SHAG | WTLS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.12% | 0.88% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $43M | $11M |
| Since | 2017 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 4.30% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.40 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.09% | — |
| Max drawdown | -9.61% | -8.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SHAG and WTLS
Explore further