Screener
SHLD vs SPDF
Global X Defense Tech ETF vs Defender Risk Adaptive 500 ETF
Key differences
- SHLD costs 0.19% less per year.
- SHLD is significantly larger than SPDF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SHLD follows a index tracking strategy; SPDF uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| SHLD | SPDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8.1B | $5M |
| Since | 2023 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 0.52% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.58% | — |
| Max drawdown | -20.10% | -1.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SHLD and SPDF
Explore further