Screener
SHUS vs IWB
Stratified LargeCap Hedged ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 ETF
Key differences
- IWB costs 0.64% less per year.
- IWB is significantly larger than SHUS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SHUS is classified as alternative, while IWB is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- SHUS follows a option income strategy; IWB uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, IWB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SHUS | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $24M | $46.2B |
| Since | 2021 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 1.29% | 0.96% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.8% | +29.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.5% | +22.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.60 | 1.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.16% | 12.07% |
| Max drawdown | -14.09% | -34.60% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SHUS and IWB
Explore further