Screener
SHV vs SCHQ
iShares 0–1 Year Treasury Bond ETF vs Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
Key differences
- SCHQ costs 0.12% less per year.
- SHV is significantly larger than SCHQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SHV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SHV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SHV | SCHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $20.6B | $897M |
| Since | 2007 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 3.92% | 4.76% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.0% | +5.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.7% | -1.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.3% | -5.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 4.33 | -0.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.21% | 9.07% |
| Max drawdown | -0.45% | -46.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SHV and SCHQ
Explore further