Screener
SIL vs GBUG
Global X Silver Miners ETF vs Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF
Key differences
- SIL costs 0.25% less per year.
- SIL is significantly larger than GBUG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SIL follows a index tracking strategy; GBUG uses active selection.
- SIL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SIL | GBUG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.90% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.3B | $164M |
| Since | 2010 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.12% | 1.55% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +110.6% | +74.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +48.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.09 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 49.93% | 47.45% |
| Max drawdown | -63.04% | -32.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SIL and GBUG
Explore further