Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

SKF vs REW

ProShares UltraShort Financials vs ProShares UltraShort Technology

SKF

ProShares UltraShort Financials

ProShares

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$16M

REW

ProShares UltraShort Technology

ProShares

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$4M

Key differences

  • SKF is significantly larger than REW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, SKF has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

SKFREW
Annual cost (TER)0.95%0.95%
Fund size (AUM)$16M$4M
Since20072007
Dividend yield4.31%7.20%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyinverseinverse
CAGR 1Y-5.0%-61.2%
CAGR 3Y-25.8%-46.9%
CAGR 5Y-16.5%-39.3%
Sharpe 3Y-0.88-1.17
Volatility 1Y28.95%41.51%
Max drawdown-96.51%-99.74%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to SKF and REW