Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

SKF vs SDS

ProShares UltraShort Financials vs ProShares UltraShort S&P500

SKF

ProShares UltraShort Financials

ProShares

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$16M

SDS

ProShares UltraShort S&P500

ProShares

Annual cost

0.91%

Fund size

$443M

Key differences

  • SDS is significantly larger than SKF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, SKF has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

SKFSDS
Annual cost (TER)0.95%0.91%
Fund size (AUM)$16M$443M
Since20072006
Dividend yield4.31%5.29%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyinverseinverse
CAGR 1Y-4.1%-37.7%
CAGR 3Y-25.2%-29.6%
CAGR 5Y-16.7%-22.8%
Sharpe 3Y-0.85-1.16
Volatility 1Y28.99%23.88%
Max drawdown-96.51%-96.42%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to SKF and SDS