Screener
SKF vs UBT
ProShares UltraShort Financials vs ProShares Ultra 20+ Year Treasury
Key differences
SKF is an equity ETF, while UBT is a fixed income ETF. SKF charges 0.95% a year and UBT 0.95%.
- SKF is an equity fund, while UBT is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- SKF follows a inverse strategy; UBT uses leveraged.
- UBT is much larger than SKF. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, UBT has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SKF | UBT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $15M | $64M |
| Since | 2007 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 4.20% | 3.98% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | inverse | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -7.5% | +2.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | -26.2% | -9.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | -16.8% | -17.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.90 | -0.36 |
| Volatility 1Y | 29.37% | 19.22% |
| Max drawdown | -96.51% | -78.90% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.