Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

SKYU vs ROM

ProShares Ultra Cloud Computing vs ProShares Ultra Technology

SKYU

ProShares Ultra Cloud Computing

ProShares

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$2M

ROM

ProShares Ultra Technology

ProShares

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$961M

Key differences

  • ROM is significantly larger than SKYU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, ROM has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • ROM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

SKYUROM
Annual cost (TER)0.95%0.95%
Fund size (AUM)$2M$961M
Since20212007
Dividend yield0.88%0.21%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyleveragedleveraged
CAGR 1Y+21.8%+126.3%
CAGR 3Y+38.9%+58.4%
CAGR 5Y-0.1%+29.7%
Sharpe 3Y0.821.14
Volatility 1Y51.66%41.23%
Max drawdown-83.01%-67.55%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to SKYU and ROM