Screener
SKYU vs SEF
ProShares Ultra Cloud Computing vs ProShares Short Financials
Key differences
- SEF is significantly larger than SKYU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SKYU follows a leveraged strategy; SEF uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, SKYU has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SEF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SKYU | SEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $18M |
| Since | 2021 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 0.88% | 3.44% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.9% | +0.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +37.2% | -10.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.1% | -6.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.80 | -0.86 |
| Volatility 1Y | 51.65% | 14.40% |
| Max drawdown | -83.01% | -75.66% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SKYU and SEF
Explore further