Screener
SLVP vs COPA
iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF vs Themes Copper Miners ETF
Key differences
- SLVP is significantly larger than COPA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SLVP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SLVP | COPA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $945M | $13M |
| Since | 2012 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.72% | 3.93% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +129.6% | +116.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +50.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.06 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 52.87% | 38.48% |
| Max drawdown | -62.04% | -34.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SLVP and COPA
Explore further