Screener
SLVP vs HSCZ
iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF vs iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
- SLVP is significantly larger than HSCZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SLVP has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SLVP | HSCZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.43% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $945M | $208M |
| Since | 2012 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 1.72% | 3.04% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +133.9% | +32.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +51.8% | +19.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.6% | +11.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.09 | 1.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 52.96% | 11.31% |
| Max drawdown | -62.04% | -34.89% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SLVP and HSCZ
Explore further