Screener
SLVP vs SCZ
iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF vs iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
- SCZ is significantly larger than SLVP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SLVP has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SCZ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SLVP | SCZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $945M | $14.4B |
| Since | 2012 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.72% | 3.05% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +133.9% | +27.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +51.8% | +16.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.6% | +6.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.09 | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 52.96% | 14.50% |
| Max drawdown | -62.04% | -41.07% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SLVP and SCZ
Explore further