Screener
SLVP vs METL
iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF vs Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF
Key differences
- SLVP costs 0.60% less per year.
- SLVP is significantly larger than METL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SLVP follows a index tracking strategy; METL uses active selection.
- SLVP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SLVP | METL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.99% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $945M | $95M |
| Since | 2012 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.72% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +133.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +51.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.09 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 52.96% | — |
| Max drawdown | -62.04% | -27.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SLVP and METL
Explore further