Screener
SLVP vs RING
iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF vs iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF
Key differences
- RING is significantly larger than SLVP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SLVP has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SLVP | RING | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $945M | $2.9B |
| Since | 2012 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 1.72% | 0.80% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +129.6% | +80.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +50.1% | +45.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.0% | +19.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.06 | 1.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | 52.87% | 45.82% |
| Max drawdown | -62.04% | -52.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SLVP and RING
Explore further