Screener
SLX vs MOO
VanEck Steel ETF vs VanEck Agribusiness ETF
Key differences
- MOO is significantly larger than SLX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SLX has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SLX | MOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.56% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $159M | $1.2B |
| Since | 2006 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.27% | 2.15% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +80.3% | +14.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.6% | +2.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.6% | -0.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | 0.01 |
| Volatility 1Y | 24.19% | 13.87% |
| Max drawdown | -61.90% | -39.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SLX and MOO
Explore further