Screener
MOO vs HAP
VanEck Agribusiness ETF vs VanEck Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
- HAP costs 0.15% less per year.
- MOO is significantly larger than HAP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, HAP has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MOO | HAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.56% | 0.41% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.2B | $316M |
| Since | 2007 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 2.15% | 1.86% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.3% | +47.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.5% | +18.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.6% | +11.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.01 | 0.92 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.89% | 14.91% |
| Max drawdown | -39.52% | -44.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MOO and HAP
Explore further