Screener
SLX vs SMOG
VanEck Steel ETF vs VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
Key differences
- SLX costs 0.09% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, SLX has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SLX | SMOG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.64% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $159M | $152M |
| Since | 2006 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.27% | 1.31% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +80.3% | +43.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.6% | +11.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.6% | +3.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | 0.45 |
| Volatility 1Y | 24.19% | 20.30% |
| Max drawdown | -61.90% | -51.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SLX and SMOG
Explore further