Screener
SMOG vs HAP
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF vs VanEck Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
- HAP costs 0.23% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, HAP has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMOG | HAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.64% | 0.41% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $152M | $316M |
| Since | 2007 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 1.31% | 1.86% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +43.1% | +47.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.7% | +18.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.0% | +11.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.45 | 0.92 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.30% | 14.91% |
| Max drawdown | -51.11% | -44.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SMOG and HAP
Explore further