Screener
SLX vs XME
VanEck Steel ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
Key differences
- XME costs 0.20% less per year.
- XME is significantly larger than SLX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SLX covers global markets; XME covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, XME has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SLX | XME | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $159M | $5.3B |
| Since | 2006 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.27% | 0.32% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +80.3% | +106.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.6% | +38.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.6% | +23.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | 1.13 |
| Volatility 1Y | 24.19% | 34.35% |
| Max drawdown | -61.90% | -61.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SLX and XME
Explore further