Screener
XME vs ICOP
State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF vs iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF
Key differences
- XME costs 0.12% less per year.
- XME is significantly larger than ICOP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XME has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XME | ICOP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.3B | $429M |
| Since | 2006 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.32% | 1.85% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +99.9% | +94.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +36.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +21.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 34.18% | 36.85% |
| Max drawdown | -61.69% | -38.67% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XME and ICOP
Explore further