Screener
SMAP vs IWN
Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF
Key differences
- IWN costs 0.36% less per year.
- IWN is significantly larger than SMAP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMAP | IWN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1M | $13.4B |
| Since | 2024 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.42% | 1.49% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.9% | +46.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.80 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.82% | 17.92% |
| Max drawdown | -24.12% | -46.08% |
Similar to SMAP and IWN
Explore further