Screener
SMCO vs PSC
Hilton Small-Midcap Opportunity ETF vs Principal U.S. Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
- PSC costs 0.17% less per year.
- PSC is significantly larger than SMCO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SMCO follows a active selection strategy; PSC uses index tracking.
- PSC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMCO | PSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $129M | $2.0B |
| Since | 2023 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.91% | 0.61% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.8% | +30.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.73% | 18.61% |
| Max drawdown | -22.71% | -46.75% |
Similar to SMCO and PSC
Explore further