Screener
SMCO vs SCHA
Hilton Small-Midcap Opportunity ETF vs Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
- SCHA costs 0.51% less per year.
- SCHA is significantly larger than SMCO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SMCO follows a active selection strategy; SCHA uses index tracking.
- SCHA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMCO | SCHA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $129M | $22.1B |
| Since | 2023 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 0.91% | 1.05% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.8% | +42.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.73% | 18.01% |
| Max drawdown | -22.71% | -42.41% |
Similar to SMCO and SCHA
Explore further