Screener
SMCO vs SCHX
Hilton Small-Midcap Opportunity ETF vs Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
Key differences
- SCHX costs 0.52% less per year.
- SCHX is significantly larger than SMCO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SMCO follows a active selection strategy; SCHX uses index tracking.
- SCHX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMCO | SCHX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $129M | $68.2B |
| Since | 2023 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 0.91% | 1.06% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.8% | +29.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +23.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.73% | 11.98% |
| Max drawdown | -22.71% | -34.33% |
Similar to SMCO and SCHX
Explore further