Screener
SMCO vs VB
Hilton Small-Midcap Opportunity ETF vs Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund ETF Shares
Key differences
- VB costs 0.52% less per year.
- VB is significantly larger than SMCO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SMCO follows a active selection strategy; VB uses index tracking.
- VB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMCO | VB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $129M | $177.4B |
| Since | 2023 | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | 0.91% | 1.23% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.8% | +30.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.78 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.73% | 16.26% |
| Max drawdown | -22.71% | -42.05% |
Similar to SMCO and VB
Explore further