Screener
SMCO vs VO
Hilton Small-Midcap Opportunity ETF vs Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund ETF Shares
Key differences
- VO costs 0.52% less per year.
- VO is significantly larger than SMCO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SMCO follows a active selection strategy; VO uses index tracking.
- VO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMCO | VO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $129M | $213.8B |
| Since | 2023 | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | 0.91% | 1.40% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.8% | +19.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.91 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.73% | 12.30% |
| Max drawdown | -22.71% | -39.37% |
Similar to SMCO and VO
Explore further