Screener
SMCP vs IWM
Smart Mid Cap Etf vs iShares Russell 2000 ETF
Key differences
- SMCP follows a active selection strategy; IWM uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMCP | IWM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $76.9B |
| Since | — | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.91% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +44.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.78 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 19.29% |
| Max drawdown | -4.57% | -41.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SMCP and IWM
Explore further