Screener
SMDV vs EFAD
ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF vs ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF
Key differences
- SMDV costs 0.10% less per year.
- SMDV is significantly larger than EFAD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SMDV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMDV | EFAD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $661M | $62M |
| Since | 2015 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 2.38% | 2.82% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.7% | +4.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.6% | +6.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.1% | +1.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.44 | 0.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.90% | 13.36% |
| Max drawdown | -34.12% | -35.74% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SMDV and EFAD
Explore further