Screener
SMH vs BBH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF vs VanEck Biotech ETF
Key differences
- SMH is significantly larger than BBH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SMH has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMH | BBH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $58.8B | $365M |
| Since | 2011 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 0.22% | 0.52% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +139.4% | +26.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +65.2% | +5.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +38.8% | +1.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.52 | 0.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | 30.31% | 18.82% |
| Max drawdown | -45.30% | -39.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SMH and BBH
Explore further