Screener
SMH vs INDZ
VanEck Semiconductor ETF vs VanEck India Select ETF
Key differences
- SMH costs 0.40% less per year.
- SMH is significantly larger than INDZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SMH covers north america markets; INDZ covers emerging markets.
- SMH follows a index tracking strategy; INDZ uses active selection.
- SMH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMH | INDZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $67.8B | $3M |
| Since | 2011 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 0.18% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +127.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +58.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +36.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.40 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 32.03% | — |
| Max drawdown | -45.30% | -15.19% |
Similar to SMH and INDZ
Explore further