Screener
SMHX vs ESPO
VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF vs VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF
Key differences
- SMHX costs 0.20% less per year.
- ESPO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMHX | ESPO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $202M | $257M |
| Since | 2024 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.02% | 1.40% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +125.0% | -9.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +20.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.80 |
| Volatility 1Y | 32.39% | 19.07% |
| Max drawdown | -38.53% | -50.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SMHX and ESPO
Explore further