Screener
SMMD vs IWN
iShares Russell 2500 ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF
Key differences
- SMMD costs 0.09% less per year.
- IWN is significantly larger than SMMD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMMD | IWN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.0B | $13.4B |
| Since | 2017 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 1.10% | 1.49% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +36.8% | +43.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.9% | +18.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.7% | +6.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 0.77 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.24% | 17.87% |
| Max drawdown | -41.06% | -46.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SMMD and IWN
Explore further