Screener
SMMD vs IWR
iShares Russell 2500 ETF vs iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF
Key differences
- IWR is significantly larger than SMMD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SMMD has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMMD | IWR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.0B | $52.6B |
| Since | 2017 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 1.10% | 1.19% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +36.8% | +21.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.9% | +17.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.7% | +8.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 0.86 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.24% | 13.50% |
| Max drawdown | -41.06% | -40.59% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SMMD and IWR
Explore further