Skip to content
Screener

SMMD vs PPH

iShares Russell 2500 ETF vs VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF

SMMD

iShares Russell 2500 ETF

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$3.4B

PPH

VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF

Annual cost

0.36%

Fund size

$942M

Key differences

Both SMMD and PPH are equity ETFs. SMMD charges 0.15% a year and PPH 0.36%. The main difference: SMMD costs 0.21% less per year.

  • SMMD costs 0.21% less per year.
  • SMMD is much larger than PPH. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, SMMD has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • PPH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

SMMDPPH
Annual cost (TER)0.15%0.36%
Fund size (AUM)$3.4B$942M
Since20172011
Dividend yield1.05%2.06%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+36.2%+20.4%
CAGR 3Y+18.1%+13.9%
CAGR 5Y+7.8%+10.1%
Sharpe 3Y0.780.69
Volatility 1Y17.74%17.68%
Max drawdown-41.06%-29.70%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

See all growth funds

Similar to SMMD and PPH