Screener
SMOG vs FDRV
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF vs Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF
Key differences
- FDRV costs 0.25% less per year.
- SMOG is significantly larger than FDRV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SMOG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SMOG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMOG | FDRV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.64% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $152M | $28M |
| Since | 2007 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.31% | 1.14% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +43.1% | +39.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.7% | +6.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.45 | 0.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.30% | 24.77% |
| Max drawdown | -51.11% | -63.89% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SMOG and FDRV
Explore further