Screener
SMOG vs VCLN
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF vs Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- VCLN costs 0.05% less per year.
- SMOG is significantly larger than VCLN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SMOG follows a index tracking strategy; VCLN uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, VCLN has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SMOG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMOG | VCLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.64% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $152M | $6M |
| Since | 2007 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.31% | 1.61% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +43.1% | +88.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.7% | +18.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.45 | 0.67 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.30% | 29.11% |
| Max drawdown | -51.11% | -45.66% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SMOG and VCLN
Explore further