Screener
SMOG vs KLMT
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF vs Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF
Key differences
- KLMT costs 0.54% less per year.
- KLMT is significantly larger than SMOG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SMOG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMOG | KLMT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.64% | 0.10% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $152M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2007 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.31% | 1.84% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +43.1% | +27.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.45 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.30% | 12.65% |
| Max drawdown | -51.11% | -16.88% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SMOG and KLMT
Explore further