Screener
SMOG vs SLX
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF vs VanEck Steel ETF
Key differences
- SLX costs 0.09% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, SLX has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMOG | SLX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.64% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $152M | $159M |
| Since | 2007 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.31% | 1.27% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +43.1% | +80.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.7% | +26.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.0% | +16.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.45 | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.30% | 24.19% |
| Max drawdown | -51.11% | -61.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SMOG and SLX
Explore further