Screener
SMTH vs RFFC
ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF vs ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF
Key differences
- RFFC costs 0.11% less per year.
- SMTH is significantly larger than RFFC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SMTH is classified as fixed income, while RFFC is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- SMTH follows a index tracking strategy; RFFC uses active selection.
- RFFC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMTH | RFFC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.48% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.7B | $29M |
| Since | 2023 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 4.41% | 0.74% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.8% | +29.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.95% | 12.11% |
| Max drawdown | -4.10% | -36.26% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SMTH and RFFC
Explore further