Screener
SNPG vs RPG
Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth Scored & Screened ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF
Key differences
- SNPG costs 0.20% less per year.
- RPG is significantly larger than SNPG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RPG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SNPG | RPG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $15M | $1.8B |
| Since | 2022 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.51% | 0.19% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.2% | +39.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.7% | +26.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.19 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.18% | 19.79% |
| Max drawdown | -21.69% | -36.58% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SNPG and RPG
Explore further