Screener
SOCL vs RYLD
Global X Social Media ETF vs Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
Key differences
- RYLD costs 0.05% less per year.
- RYLD is significantly larger than SOCL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SOCL is classified as equity, while RYLD is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- SOCL follows a index tracking strategy; RYLD uses option income.
- SOCL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SOCL | RYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $92M | $1.3B |
| Since | 2011 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 0.52% | 11.85% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | -1.7% | +24.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.7% | +8.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | -6.5% | +3.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.32 | 0.39 |
| Volatility 1Y | 22.95% | 10.84% |
| Max drawdown | -68.70% | -41.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SOCL and RYLD
Explore further