Screener
SOCL vs RYLG
Global X Social Media ETF vs Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF
Key differences
- RYLG costs 0.30% less per year.
- SOCL is significantly larger than RYLG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SOCL is classified as equity, while RYLG is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- SOCL follows a index tracking strategy; RYLG uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, RYLG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SOCL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SOCL | RYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $92M | $8M |
| Since | 2011 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.52% | 7.42% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | -1.7% | +33.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.7% | +13.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | -6.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.32 | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | 22.95% | 14.96% |
| Max drawdown | -68.70% | -22.37% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SOCL and RYLG
Explore further