Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

SOLR vs OIH

Guinness Atkinson Sustainable Energy ETF vs VanEck Oil Services ETF

SOLR

Guinness Atkinson Sustainable Energy ETF

Guinness Atkinson

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$5M

OIH

VanEck Oil Services ETF

VanEck

Annual cost

0.35%

Fund size

$2.5B

Key differences

  • OIH costs 0.44% less per year.
  • OIH is significantly larger than SOLR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, OIH has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • OIH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

SOLROIH
Annual cost (TER)0.79%0.35%
Fund size (AUM)$5M$2.5B
Since20202011
Dividend yield0.60%1.09%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+42.0%+100.2%
CAGR 3Y+6.3%+19.9%
CAGR 5Y+5.0%+16.6%
Sharpe 3Y0.230.63
Volatility 1Y19.35%29.55%
Max drawdown-39.44%-89.61%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to SOLR and OIH