Screener
SOLR vs SMOG
Guinness Atkinson Sustainable Energy ETF vs VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
Key differences
- SMOG costs 0.15% less per year.
- SMOG is significantly larger than SOLR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SMOG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SMOG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SOLR | SMOG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.64% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $152M |
| Since | 2020 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.60% | 1.31% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.0% | +43.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.3% | +11.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.0% | +3.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.23 | 0.45 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.35% | 20.30% |
| Max drawdown | -39.44% | -51.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SOLR and SMOG
Explore further