Screener
SPAM vs BCHP
Themes Cybersecurity ETF vs Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF
Key differences
- SPAM costs 0.23% less per year.
- BCHP is significantly larger than SPAM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SPAM covers north america markets; BCHP covers global.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPAM | BCHP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.58% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $223M |
| Since | 2023 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.48% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.2% | +9.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.42% | 15.82% |
| Max drawdown | -24.02% | -18.56% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPAM and BCHP
Explore further