Screener
SPAM vs GLOF
Themes Cybersecurity ETF vs iShares Global Equity Factor ETF
Key differences
- GLOF costs 0.15% less per year.
- GLOF is significantly larger than SPAM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GLOF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPAM | GLOF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $196M |
| Since | 2023 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 0.48% | 1.57% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.2% | +32.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.42% | 12.63% |
| Max drawdown | -24.02% | -34.12% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPAM and GLOF
Explore further