Screener
SPAM vs IWB
Themes Cybersecurity ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 ETF
Key differences
- IWB costs 0.20% less per year.
- IWB is significantly larger than SPAM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPAM | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $46.2B |
| Since | 2023 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.48% | 0.96% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.2% | +29.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.42% | 12.07% |
| Max drawdown | -24.02% | -34.60% |
Similar to SPAM and IWB
Explore further