Screener
SPAM vs IWM
Themes Cybersecurity ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 ETF
Key differences
- IWM costs 0.16% less per year.
- IWM is significantly larger than SPAM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPAM | IWM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $76.9B |
| Since | 2023 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.48% | 0.91% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.2% | +44.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.78 |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.42% | 19.29% |
| Max drawdown | -24.02% | -41.13% |
Similar to SPAM and IWM
Explore further